Pokie guide · Australia
Dragon Train is a pokie name you may see in lists, but there is no verified specification for it here. This page explains what the name suggests, what it does not promise, and how to read the terms on any game in this style.
The shortlist
These five pokies are ranked on their published return to player, with volatility, maximum win and line format shown alongside for context.
Checked on 16 October 2026
Big Bass Bonanza pairs a 96.71% return with high volatility, a 2,100x maximum win and 10 lines, so it leans toward frequent smaller results rather than a giant ceiling.
Madame Destiny Megaways offers a 96.51% return, high volatility, a 5,000x maximum win and megaways, giving a larger ceiling than the first entry.
Gates of Olympus sits at a 96.5% return with high volatility and a 5,000x maximum win, a similar profile to the entry above it.
Sweet Bonanza shows a 96.48% return with medium-high volatility and a 21,100x maximum win, the largest ceiling on this list.
Floating Dragon closes the list at a 96.35% return with high volatility, a 5,000x maximum win and 10 lines, a narrower format than the megaways entries.
Sort by whichever figure decides it for you.
| 1Big Bass Bonanza | 96.71% | High | 2,100x | Pragmatic Play |
| 2Madame Destiny Megaways | 96.51% | High | 5,000x | Pragmatic Play |
| 3Gates of Olympus | 96.5% | High | 5,000x | Pragmatic Play |
| 4Sweet Bonanza | 96.48% | Medium-High | 21,100x | Pragmatic Play |
| 5Floating Dragon | 96.35% | High | 5,000x | Pragmatic Play |
Select a column heading to sort.
A title like Dragon Train tells you the theme before it tells you anything about money. It suggests a locomotive, a dragon, or both, and that is all a name can be trusted to do. The name is not a specification and it is not a licence term. If you see it on a list, treat it as a label for a look and feel, not a statement about odds or prizes.
On this site, the subject of that label has no published figures we could verify, so nothing here gives it a return figure, a top prize, or a line count. That is deliberate. A name alone does not tell you what a session will do, and a session is not a long-run average. The average is a figure that only makes sense over a very large number of spins.
A maximum win figure, when a game publishes one, is the largest result the paytable allows. It is not a target you can aim at, and it is not a budget. Many players will never see it, and no bet pattern changes that. The figure describes the ceiling, not the typical result.
The same logic applies to a game with no published maximum at all. A missing figure is not a withheld secret and it is not an invitation to guess. It simply means there is nothing verified to print. Where a number is absent, the honest move is to leave it out rather than fill the gap with something that sounds plausible.
When you look at a shortlist on a site like this, the useful columns are the ones that can be checked: return to player, volatility, maximum win, and lines or ways. Those are published specifications. The name in the first column is the least informative part. Read the row, not the title.
Two games can share a theme and behave nothing alike. One may pay smaller amounts more often, another may pay rarely and heavily. That difference is captured by volatility, not by the artwork. If you only remember one thing, remember that the theme is decoration and the specification is the substance.
FAQ
It is a pokie name that appears in some lists, but this site has no verified specification for it. Treat the name as a theme label rather than a set of published figures.
Not one we could verify, so no return figure appears on this page. A number that cannot be checked is worse than no number at all.
Not necessarily. A missing figure only means the detail is unverified, not that the game hides something. Judge what is published, and leave the rest alone.
No. Pokies are games of chance and no bet pattern changes the long-run return. A return figure is an average over a very large number of spins, and any single session can fall either side of it.
It is a pokie name that appears in some lists, but this site has no verified specification for it. Treat the name as a theme label rather than a set of published figures.